Two Bitcoin Start-Ups in Nebraska Organize ‘Bitcoin Day Omaha’
Two start-ups working in the cryptocurrency realm in Omaha, Nebraska are aiming to put together a fun and educational experience for bitcoin enthusiasts and newcomers on the 15th of September in the Old Market neighborhood of the city.Dubbed Bitcoin Day Omaha, the event was organized by Alpha Bitcoin and BlockchainIO. At the event, attendees will be able to learn about this emerging digital currency, get a bitcoin wallet established, and perhaps even go on a scavenger hunt around local businesses, where they can win prizes, according to Silicon Prairie.
That’s not all, though. The half-day event will also feature a bitcoin mining demonstration and a cocktail/social hour. And if you’re in the market for some new wheels, there’s a 2014 Kia Soul that you can have a chance at winning.
At the social hour, the first bitcoin ATM in Omaha will be revealed.
All in all, if you’re in the area and don’t have a terrible lot going on that Monday night, you may want to consider popping in. The event is open to all.
Nebraska hasn’t quite been a hot spot for bitcoin activity over the past year, but this event could possibly get the ball rolling in the area.
The location of the event is Blue Sushi Sake Grill on 416 South 12th Street.
Source : http://newsbtc.com
Apple’s New Digital Wallet Patent References ‘Virtualised Currencies’
Many
analysts expect Apple to enter the mobile payments space soon and a
recent patent application that has just been made public appears to back
those claims.
The patent application reveals the backend architecture for a
versatile mobile “omni-wallet”, and, notably for the cryptocurrency
community, also references “virtualised currencies” – although this does
not necessarily mean Apple will enable digital currency functionality.
Unlike Google, which uses an open approach with Android, Apple
enforces very strict policies in its iOS ecosystem. The Cupertino-based
tech giant vets every app submitted to its app store and for some
months refused to all allow cryptocurrency apps in its walled garden.
That changed in June, with a revision of its App Store Review Guidelines that opened the floodgates for iOS bitcoin apps once again.
QR, Cloud and NFC functionality
The backend patent application describes a comprehensive wallet
system that can handle digital debit and credit cards, along with
coupons issued by merchants and other organisations.
The “virtualised currency” reference does not necessarily suggest the
wallet will be capable of storing digital currencies like bitcoin and
is general enough that it could cover a wide range of concepts, ranging
from store credit to various loyalty schemes offered by merchants, or
even Apple itself.
There is another alternative: Apple could choose to introduce a digital currency of its own, similar to Amazon Coins. The US Patent and Trademark Organisation (USPTO) published an Apple patent application for ‘iMoney’ last year.
Putting the pieces together
Apple does not have a habit of launching incomplete products. The
company is renowned for polishing and, perhaps, overdesigning its
products, both in the software and hardware departments. So we expect
nothing less from its upcoming payments push.
And while the company usually keeps a tight lid on leaks, it does
seem to be setting up the building blocks for a comprehensive mobile
payments service.
Last year’s iPhone 5S launched with Touch ID, a simple fingerprint
sensor that enables biometric authentication. With the iOS 8 Touch ID
API, the company will open up the sensor to third-party apps.
It is also rumoured that Apple will integrate Near Field
Communications (NFC) in upcoming iPhones, which could launch in a matter
of weeks.
The company’s iBeacon technology is based on Bluetooth 4.0 Low Energy
and it is already available on a wide range of Apple devices running
iOS 7. The technology has a number of potential applications in brick-and-mortar shops.
On their own, none of these technologies deserve the ‘killer app’
moniker. However, Apple already has upwards of 800 million user accounts
and the sheer size of its user base could prove more important than the
technology behind its products and services. Quite what that technology
is, we’ll just have to wait and see.
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
BitBeat: For Bitcoin’s Miners and Spenders, a Supply and Demand Imbalance
- Getty Images
Welcome to BitBeat, your daily dose of crypto-current events, written by Paul Vigna and Michael J. Casey.
Bitcoin Latest Price: $510.99, up 1.9% (via CoinDesk)
Crossing Our Desk:
- The amount of hardware being thrown at bitcoin mining continues to rise,
but if those mined bitcoins aren’t being used, an imbalance between
supply and demand will develop that may increase volatility in the
price, CitiFX’s Steven Englander wrote in a note.
The number of transactions have been stable this year, in a range between 60,000 and 80,000 a day,
according to data from Blockchain. That’s a huge jump from under 10,000
a day two summers ago. The problem is the number of transactions has
plateaued at those levels, but the amount of mining activity keeps
increasing. The degree of difficulty in mining – the built-in adjusting
mechanism that makes solving the bitcoin algorithm harder as more miners
come onboard – has jumped twice recently, and the hashrate, a measure
of total mining activity, has been rising as well.
“This uninspired demand side may interact with the rising costs of
mining, which has become a very specialized and capital intensive
industry,” Mr. Englander said. “For now we have miners looking to sell
and not much of anyone looking to buy.”
Mr. Englander thinks this will make “extreme volatility” inevitable.
It seems to us that it could result in miners simply hoarding their
mined bitcoins rather than sell at low prices. Either way, the real key
here seems to be the transaction flow, and right now at least it’s
pretty stable – which for bitcoin isn’t necessarily a good thing. (Paul Vigna)
- Korbit, a South Korean bitcoin exchange, raised $3 million
in Series A funding, with the round led by SoftBank Ventures Korea, and
in the U.S. by Pantera Capital. Other investors included BAM Ventures,
Bitcoin Opportunity Corp., Tim Draper, Pietro Dova and Strong Ventures.
The company, which began in April 2013, operates an exchange, and offers
wallet and merchant-processing services. It raised $400,000 in January.
(Paul Vigna)
In the News:
- Speaking of mining, you can mine cheaply, to be sure, but can you do it profitably? A new service from GAW Miners offers cloud-mining contracts for as little as $16, according to a post on Inside Bitcoins. The question they pose is whether you can make any money at that low price.
The company calls these contracts “Hashlets,” and proclaimed in a forum post that
“there will never be a time a Hashlet cost more to run than you make,
and they will always make money.” Given the legion of problems that have
bedeviled the mining industry, that kind of a claim is going to raise
immediate flags.
That $15.99 price buys you on megahash (a measure of processing
power); customers can buy more if they wish. Inside Bitcoins did a
back-on-the-envelope assessment, and figured you could make your money
back in about two months, however they were concerned about those
increases in the level of difficulty, ”with the most recent one being
quite significant.” That could cut into the profitability of the
Hashlets, they argue.
The bottom line here is that the more miners that come online, the
harder it gets for everybody to mine, and the lower the payouts – unless
you spent the considerable sums to corral enough hardware to offset the
rising difficulty. The trick becomes spending enough to keep ahead of
the competition, and turn a profit. (Paul Vigna)
Source : http://blogs.wsj.com
DigitalBTC’s New Mining Centre Powered 100% by Renewable Energy
Australian
bitcoin firm digitalBTC has announced a multi-year hosting and power
supply agreement with Verne Global – a UK-based company specialised in
“power-conscious” data centre solutions.
Under the agreement, digitalBTC will instal mining hardware at Verne
Global’s data centre campus in Iceland, which is powered exclusively by
renewable energy, and will source approximately 50% of its power needs
from the company.
The remainder of its Icelandic electricity requirements will also be sourced from green suppliers, digitalBTC indicates.
Cutting operating costs
DigitalBTC highlights a number of advantages provided by the new
deal. It expects significant savings on power costs of up to 40%,
which will in turn help increase the return on investment (ROI) from its
bitcoin mining operations.
The savings will also enable the company to extend the life of the
mining hardware, as cheaper power means mining hardware remains
economically viable for longer periods of time.
Lastly, using dual-sourced renewable energy will significantly reduce the carbon footprint and allow for more expansion.
Zhenya Tsvetnenko, digitalBTC executive chairman, said the agreement
would provide the company with stable, cheap and green power in the long
run:
“As well as basing our operations on clean renewable energy, we are also able to drive significant power cost reductions, which will flow straight through to our bottom line, and significantly reduce our carbon emission through the use of green energy. Additional power is very hard to secure in many locations, where the capacity has already been reached.”
Tsvetnenko concluded the contract with Verne Global gives digitalBTC
more room to grow and will be factored into the company’s decisions on
potential expansions.
Green power, free cooling
Verne Global sources power for its data centre campus from Iceland’s
power grid, which almost completely relies on geothermal and
hydroelectric power.
Furthermore, the company uses ‘free-cooling’, which essentially means
it relies on the naturally low air temperature to keep
server temperatures down. This helps the firm save money on cooling, as
server rooms usually need a lot of costly air-conditioning to avoid
overheating.
Verne Global CEO Jeff Monroe said digital currency is moving into the
mainstream and it is becoming clear that digitalBTC is making “sound
business decisions” that indicate they will be a significant player in
the digital currency industry for years to come.
As far as mining hardware goes, digitalBTC has decided to stick with BitFury. The company ordered its first $2m batch of BitFury miners back in March, with additional tranches following later.
As of 30th June, the company claimed to hold an estimated 3,600 BTC
awaiting liquidation and, by July, had mined a total of 8,600 BTC. In a regulatory filing, digitalBTC said it had achieved “complete payback” on $4m-worth of BitFury mining hardware.
In a recent feature, CoinDesk examined how and why bitcoin mining companies are moving to regions with cheaper cooling and energy, with Scandinavia and Iceland proving especially popular.
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
The Long-Term Drivers of Bitcoin
Last week, in an opening salvo into the Bitcoin trading world,
I suggested that you may want to look at a long position in Bitcoin
against the U.S. Dollar to take advantage of the weakness in the
previous weeks. That looked good initially as the expected jump came and
would still be showing a profit, but the retracement over the last
couple of days upheld what I said at the time, that this was a fairly
long-term idea and as such required a belief in the fundamental value of
the virtual currency.
I am not a Bitcoin evangelist, nor an expert, but then neither
am I a hater. I simply have a trading background and therefore have an
interest in a volatile market. The deeper I have looked into the
phenomenon, however, the more convinced I have become that Bitcoin has a
future and could have a lasting influence on the world of business and
finance.
My writing on the subject has prompted several discussions with people who hold a range of views, but I have yet to find anybody who has given me what I consider a convincing argument as to why they believe it will fail. If you have such an argument, feel free to enlighten me in the comment section. Usually that view seems to be based on an inability, or sometimes an unwillingness, to understand what Bitcoin is and how it functions. Some have said that it is all an illusion based on perceived rather than real value, at which point I gently point out that the same is true of the pieces of green paper that they dedicate so much of their life to accumulating.
To me it seems that a virtual peer-to-peer currency is just that, a currency, but one with the built in advantage of an inherent limit to supply. If the argument is simply that it is overvalued, then fine; I disagree at current levels, but every trade needs a buyer and a seller. While that disagreement may result in short term volatility, though, it is hard to see how a currency that has some degree of scarcity can, over time, fail to appreciate against one where supply continues to increase.
That function as a currency, though, is important, as supply is only half the story. That is why I included in last week’s piece the expansion of merchants accepting Bitcoin for payment as a positive upward driver of price. As Cloud Jacking rightly pointed out in the comments on that article, though, in the short term that is actually a negative for the exchange rate. The Bitcoin that is spent is immediately converted to dollars, so more merchants mean more sellers and therefore downward pressure on price. That is true, but if Bitcoin is to establish itself as a genuine global currency, then wider acceptance is essential. Once that comes, the dynamics of limited and decreasing supply versus the ever expanding supply of other currencies take over.
I also touched on the growing use of Bitcoin in third world and developing nations. I don’t wish to drift into the hyperbole that so often characterizes true believers in technological innovation, but it strikes me that in that respect a virtual currency has transformational potential. I am speculating to some degree, but it would seem logical that building wealth in many of those nations has been discouraged by the tendency of governments in the past to inflate away the value of wealth stored in the native currency.
As the Chinese government discovered, exchange controls on something that exists in a virtual environment are difficult, if not impossible to enforce, so there is now a way for those of an entrepreneurial bent in poorer nations to store and accumulate wealth. Call me a crazy idealist, but I believe that that will encourage innovation and entrepreneurship in those countries. In the short term that may have some detrimental effects in developed nations but generally expansion of the global economy is a good thing. Regardless, it will provide a growing source of demand.
None of this means, however, that Bitcoin is necessarily going to appreciate over the next few weeks or months. Market dynamics make that likely, but not certain. That is why I recommended a stop loss be put in place just below the $400 level if you were to buy at around $475. In fact if that level breaks a run back down to around $200 would look likely, so if your trading platform allows it a short with a tight stop may be a decent strategy if that happens.
If it does, and I suggest such a trade though, it would be just a trade. There are strong enough long term drivers to suggest that, as hard as it is for some to comprehend, Bitcoin is here to stay.
Source : http://www.nasdaq.com
My writing on the subject has prompted several discussions with people who hold a range of views, but I have yet to find anybody who has given me what I consider a convincing argument as to why they believe it will fail. If you have such an argument, feel free to enlighten me in the comment section. Usually that view seems to be based on an inability, or sometimes an unwillingness, to understand what Bitcoin is and how it functions. Some have said that it is all an illusion based on perceived rather than real value, at which point I gently point out that the same is true of the pieces of green paper that they dedicate so much of their life to accumulating.
To me it seems that a virtual peer-to-peer currency is just that, a currency, but one with the built in advantage of an inherent limit to supply. If the argument is simply that it is overvalued, then fine; I disagree at current levels, but every trade needs a buyer and a seller. While that disagreement may result in short term volatility, though, it is hard to see how a currency that has some degree of scarcity can, over time, fail to appreciate against one where supply continues to increase.
That function as a currency, though, is important, as supply is only half the story. That is why I included in last week’s piece the expansion of merchants accepting Bitcoin for payment as a positive upward driver of price. As Cloud Jacking rightly pointed out in the comments on that article, though, in the short term that is actually a negative for the exchange rate. The Bitcoin that is spent is immediately converted to dollars, so more merchants mean more sellers and therefore downward pressure on price. That is true, but if Bitcoin is to establish itself as a genuine global currency, then wider acceptance is essential. Once that comes, the dynamics of limited and decreasing supply versus the ever expanding supply of other currencies take over.
I also touched on the growing use of Bitcoin in third world and developing nations. I don’t wish to drift into the hyperbole that so often characterizes true believers in technological innovation, but it strikes me that in that respect a virtual currency has transformational potential. I am speculating to some degree, but it would seem logical that building wealth in many of those nations has been discouraged by the tendency of governments in the past to inflate away the value of wealth stored in the native currency.
As the Chinese government discovered, exchange controls on something that exists in a virtual environment are difficult, if not impossible to enforce, so there is now a way for those of an entrepreneurial bent in poorer nations to store and accumulate wealth. Call me a crazy idealist, but I believe that that will encourage innovation and entrepreneurship in those countries. In the short term that may have some detrimental effects in developed nations but generally expansion of the global economy is a good thing. Regardless, it will provide a growing source of demand.
None of this means, however, that Bitcoin is necessarily going to appreciate over the next few weeks or months. Market dynamics make that likely, but not certain. That is why I recommended a stop loss be put in place just below the $400 level if you were to buy at around $475. In fact if that level breaks a run back down to around $200 would look likely, so if your trading platform allows it a short with a tight stop may be a decent strategy if that happens.
If it does, and I suggest such a trade though, it would be just a trade. There are strong enough long term drivers to suggest that, as hard as it is for some to comprehend, Bitcoin is here to stay.
Source : http://www.nasdaq.com
BlockSign Utilises Block Chain to Verify Signed Contracts
A new company, BlockSign, lets customers digitally sign legally binding contracts and preserve them in the public domain.
Running on the block chain, the decentralised public ledger that records transactions on the bitcoin network, the BlockSign platform provides a way to sign, timestamp and later verify documents on the web.
How BlockSign works
From a user perspective, BlockSign works as a web application. A PDF
signed with the program will indicate where a signature is to be placed,
and the user places a stamp in a stylized font there. Into this
signature is encoded an email address and the date.
The BlockSign service then creates a cryptographic hash of the entire
document, which it stores in a 40-byte slot included in every bitcoin
block, called OP_RETURN. That slot can be used for storing messages and
other arbitrary data.
That means that the hash is logged in the block chain. “We verify the
document, running it through the hashing function, and we search the
block chain for the string to see if it has been logged,” said founder
Nicholas Thorne.
A verification record stored by the company on the user’s behalf
enables users to check that a particular document is signed and valid.
The system’s security relies on two-factor authentication. It sends a
confirmation request to the user via email to confirm their identity.
Of course, email is notoriously insecure, so Thorne hopes to use private
keys at some point.
Misuse of the block chain?
Not all developers are enthusiastic about the idea of using bitcoin for timestamping documents.
“In my opinion, ideally the bitcoin block chain should be used for
bitcoin payments,” says Adam Back. He developed Hashcash, the algorithm
bitcoin uses to generate and verify currency, and has also been working
on a system for application-specific block chains, linked to bitcoin’s own.
OP_RETURN’s 40 bytes were originally meant to be 80 bytes.
Today, the 40-byte limit compares to an average recent transaction size
of 570 bytes, which makes its theoretical limit roughly 7% of the
average block size.
BlockSign doesn’t use all of that OP_RETURN space. It only uses 32
bytes for its hash – and the slot is not used by many people at all
today. Roughly a quarter of blocks used OP_RETURN in a recent 80-block
block chain sample.
Businesses welcome
Bitcoin developer Mike Hearn isn’t worried about more companies using OP_RETURN for their networks.
“Bitcoin’s limiting factor today is actually growing legitimate usage
and traffic,” he said. “The more users we have, the more political
immunity we have, so if some of those users care more about
time-stamping documents than buying things, that’s OK by me. I’m sure
bitcoin can scale to accommodate everyone.”
Having said that, if use of OP_RETURN for applications like
BlockSign’s caught on, it could be more expensive, Hearn said. “Like any
bitcoin transaction, you have to pay for it using either fees or coin
priority. If some company were to start using lots of these
transactions, the fee costs would start to increase.”
Both Hearn and Back recommend using a Merkle tree
structure, which enables many timestamps to be compressed into a single
OP_RETURN output. “This would be a way to save money for only a little
bit of extra code,” Hearn says.
However, Thorne says that the team hasn’t used the Merkle tree system
in its first release, arguing that the company wanted to get a product
out there that was simple to use. However, the team is considering
Merkle tree storage for a future release, he says, arguing that the
venture doesn’t yet have the volume to make it an issue. BlockSign will
have to swallow more transaction fees in the meantime.
Giving back to bitcoin
There is another question, however: should companies piggyback
private, for-profit activities on the block chain without investing time
in supporting bitcoin development?
Thorne admits that his team of three developers isn’t contributing to bitcoin’s open-source project.
“They would love nothing more than to be able to push up a change
that was accepted, and I think they’re working hard to do that, but they
probably just haven’t done it yet because they’re still learning a lot
and building this one implementation,” said Thorne, adding:
“But I think that will allow us to learn and make recommendations over time and contribute meaningfully to what’s going on.”
Bitcoin core developers have complained about the lack of help from for-profit businesses in the past, and Hearn has pointed out multiple times that protocol development is suffering.
Bitcoin’s lead developer Wladimir van der Laan echoed the need for
more support. “There are huge investments in bitcoin companies, but only
very little of that ends up helping bitcoin core development,” he said.
About BlockSign
Thorne’s team was originally formed a couple of years ago, as part of Basno, a digital badge company that Thorne founded.
That team raised $1.225m in a seed funding round in summer 2013.
Basno is now a revenue-generating business, and the company is using the
funding at a “pretty slow burn rate,” Thorne said, adding
that BlockSign is a subsidiary of Basno.
Not contributing to the bitcoin protocol’s core development while
aiming to use it for profit isn’t something unique to BlockSign by any
means.
Van der Laansaid:
“Of all the companies in the bitcoin space (including mining pools, mining hardware producers, exchanges, payment processors, wallet vendors), as far as I know it is still only BitPay that has significant contributions to Bitcoin Core.”
The question for readers is this: is this a situation which needs rectifying?
Disclaimers: This article
should not be viewed as an endorsement of any of the companies
mentioned. Please do your own extensive research before considering
investing any funds in these products. Additionally, CoinDesk founder
Shakil Khan is an investor in BitPay.
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
Bootstrapping a Bitcoin Startup Amid Argentina’s Financial Uncertainty
While innovative ideas aren’t in short supply in the bitcoin
community, bootstrapping a bitcoin business remains a risky proposition
no matter how promising the market.
For example, despite the widespread perception that Argentina has
emerged as the leading bitcoin market in Latin America, the country
still poses a significant challenge for entrepreneurs given its lack of regulatory clarity and history of capital controls.
Despite these challenges, however, Argentina’s entrepreneurs are
seeking to bring the benefits of bitcoin to the market. One such
entrepreneur is Matías Bari, CEO and co-founder of bitcoin brokerage SatoshiTango, a Buenos Aires-based business that styles itself as a Coinbase for the country’s bitcoin users.
A former chemical engineer and e-commerce industry veteran, Bari
first learned about bitcoin in 2013 upon reading about the
then-unfolding saga of Silk Road.
Like many, Bari’s initial interest soon blossomed into a fascination
with cryptography. Bari told his friend and current partner Mariano
Craiem about bitcoin, and both were soon hooked on its potential.
Bari recalled:
“For three to four months, everyday we were saying let’s do something with bitcoin, we have to do something with bitcoin, so we started to learn, we bought bitcoin, we sold bitcoin, we lost money, we made money, then we said ‘OK, let’s do this, let’s start a business.’”
Together with two additional partners, Bari and Craiem launched
SatoshiTango with the goal of making bitcoin buying and selling easy for
the average Argentinian, putting their savings on the line in the
process.
The power of prepaid
For SatoshiTango, Bari is seeking to create a user-friendly system
that avoids the clutter and financial jargon of a traditional bitcoin
exchange, while leveraging financial tools that are more familiar to
Argentinian shoppers.
One notable design aspect is that users don’t buy bitcoin directly
from the SatoshiTango website. Rather, they order a prepaid card
featuring a 16-digit code that they can then use online to purchase
bitcoin.
Bari explained:
“We believe that if people are familiar with prepaid cards, why not use these? People are very happy because they understand when they buy a prepaid card, the card is ready to buy bitcoin, and the exact amount they have in their hands is what they can buy.”
Argentinian consumers, Bari said, are used to pre-paying for
purchases, and that such buying behavior is common among cellphone
users, who pay for minutes as needed, rather than on a monthly basis.
Notably, the idea to use prepaid services as an onboarding tool is
not unique to SatoshiTango. Argentina-based merchant processor BitPagos,
for example, recently launched Ripio, a service that allows bitcoin users to make purchases using a popular mobile phone recharging service.
Sellers, in turn, can choose to receive their money by wire transfer or
in cash, although the cash delivery service is available only to
residents in Buenos Aires. SatoshiTango charges a 2% fee for all
transactions.
Finding solutions
Of course, given the difficulties of operating in Argentina, Bari
indicated that the SatoshiTango service is not yet as advanced as it
aspires to be.
For example, he notes that while he is happy with SatoshiTango’s
prepaid payment system, his company is currently barred from more
advanced solutions like those in the US that might be more consumer
friendly.
“We cannot do the same thing that Coinbase does. We cannot take money
with an ACH [automated clearing house transaction], with an automatic
debit from a bank account, it’s not legal in Argentina,” Bari explained.
As a self-funded startup, Bari also noted the challenge of handling
legal costs to ensure his service is compliant with local laws. However,
Bari said, his startup intends to shoulder this burden using their
personal funds, adding:
“You can really spend a lot of money on advising, but we’re willing to spend that money, we’re using our savings and trying to figure out how to make the next step.”
In spite of the company’s efforts to offer an introductory service,
Bari suggests that mainstream user adoption of bitcoin is still far off,
noting that most of the company’s users are early bitcoin adopters.
Real risk remains
Bari acknowledged that Argentina’s government is still learning about
bitcoin, and that his belief is that its officials still harbor certain
reservations about its use.
In part, Bari said, this is due to misconceptions about bitcoin that
the community can take action to help dispel. Referring to the recent
restrictive policies embraced in Ecuador and Bolivia, he said:
“We need to help the authorities to understand that this is not a way to launder money. [...] I think that most of this banning takes place because of fear and misinformation.”
When asked about fellow Argentina-based bitcoin exchange Unisend
and its issues securing a bank account, Bari acknowledged the
possibility that his business could face similar operational challenges.
Still, he chose instead to focus on the benefits that persevering through this period of uncertainty would bring, saying:
“It’s a challenge, but once you succeed in Argentina, you can go to other countries in Latin America. It’s much easier. You get trained here, you have to work so hard for things that in other places are not that hard.”
Sweat and struggle
Bari said that SatoshiTango is currently a four-man operation and,
for now, the founders plan to keep it that way, although they do
recognize they will need the capital to realize their goals down the
road.
Working at a bootstrapped business means all four members juggle
multiple tasks, speaking to customers, adding new features to the site
and keeping up to date on an evolving industry.
Here again Bari emphasized the positive aspects of working in such an
operation where the founders’ “sweat and blood” are the main
ingredients for success.
He concluded:
“I wake up earlier than before, because I like to start my day with SatoshiTango, and I believe that is the great advantage. We really enjoy this.”
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
Japanese Politician to Crowdfund Bitcoin Research Tour
Japanese politician and bitcoin supporter Mineyuki Fukuda has taken a
novel approach to bitcoin research, launching an online crowdfunding
campaign to conduct a research tour of bitcoin businesses in the US.
So far, Fukuda has raised 23% of his target ¥600,000
($1,367) needed to fund the mission, which he is conducting
independently. By taking the tour as a private citizen, he is not
drawing any taxpayer funds.
Fukuda, a member of parliament with the governing Liberal Democratic
Party, has been a pioneer for digital currency acceptance in Japanese
politics. As head of the government’s IT Strategy Committee, he has frequently met with representatives from the bitcoin community at his office and even attended local meetups.
His efforts have led to the formation of Japan’s digital chamber of commerce group the Japan Association of Digital Asset (JADA), which has the government’s blessing and will liaise between businesses and relevant government departments.
Crowdfunding campaign
Fukuda’s crowdfunding campaign site describes the mission as one that
will find the politician “visiting the frontline” of the bitcoin and
digital currency industry with the intent to exchange opinions and
ideas.
“Bitcoin is called the greatest invention since the Internet,” it continues.
The campaign details page also lists some basic background and
information about bitcoin, and mentions that Japan’s own homegrown
digital currency, Monacoin, has received international attention.
Donor rewards
As with most crowdfunding campaigns, there is a rewards hierarchy based on the chosen level of participation:
- ¥1,000 ($9.60) will earn donors a published copy of Fukuda’s research report
- ¥3,000 ($28.90) lets you join Fukuda as he makes a street-side ‘stump speech’ and even speak yourself for three minutes
- ¥5,000 ($48.10) allows you to attend a live seminar where Fukuda will present his findings
- ¥10,000 ($96.30, limited to 30) gets you a seat at a dinner presentation Fukuda will host (dinner not included)
- ¥50,000 ($481, limited to nine) takes you on the full tour of Japan’s Parliament House, with Fukuda as a guide and lunch provided.
All donations receive a copy of the report.
Ironically, perhaps, the Japanese crowdfunding platform used, ShootingStar.jp, does not accept bitcoin.
Japanese digital currency policy
Despite the interest shown in digital currencies by Fukuda and other
individual members of Japan’s parliament from both major parties, the
government has no plans for new legislation. Its only official statement
has been, “We’re in charge of money. If it’s not money, it’s not the
Ministry of Finance/Financial Services Authority’s jurisdiction.”
For now, this is a benefit to bitcoin businesses, as the government
has not sought to regulate the industry. Instead it is putting its trust
in representative organizations like JADA to form guidelines and help
the industry self-govern.
On the other hand, creditors of failed bitcoin exchange Mt Gox (which
collapsed before any of the initiatives mentioned here were created) have bemoaned the lack of official consumer protection for bitcoin business users.
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
Citi: Miners and Merchants Are Keeping Bitcoin Prices Low
Bitcoin’s
price is poised for “acute instability” due to an oversupply of coins
from miners and large merchants, along with a weak growth in demand,
according to a new research note from financial giant Citi.
The Citi analysis points to the increased sophistication and cost of mining as a major driver for growth in bitcoin supply.
As mining costs rise, miners come under pressure to sell their
freshly unearthed bitcoin to recoup the costs of their investment in
equipment. Citi notes that about 3,500 BTC are mined daily, against a
backdrop of 60,000–10,000 BTC in daily trading volume in recent months.
The research note says:
“If the miners are a steady source of supply and there is no increase in final demand, we have this overhang of bitcoin being sold in the market. In consequence, we have downward price pressures.”
Merchants add downwards pressure
Citi also arrives at a counter-intuitive conclusion about prominent merchants embracing bitcoin payments.
Moves by firms like Dell and Expedia
to accept bitcoin for laptops or for hotel bookings are generally
viewed with enthusiasm by the bitcoin faithful. However, Citi points out
that the merchants are converting any bitcoin they receive from
customers into fiat immediately, putting further selling pressure on the
bitcoin price.
“For corporations to receive bitcoin and hold it would be an aberration.”
Additionally, Citi points out that accounting rules may prevent large corporations from holding bitcoin even if they wanted to.
Under the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
corporations may not be able to count bitcoin holdings as a hedge
against currency risk due to the volatile nature of the digital
currency. They may instead have to count bitcoin assets as a speculative
position, which would increase their risk profile.
In other words, large merchants can’t be relied on to drive bitcoin
demand, nor are they long-term holders of the digital currency.
“For corporations to receive bitcoin and hold it would be an aberration,” the Citi note said.
Weak consumer demand
With bitcoin supply growing from miner and merchant sales, demand for
the digital currency has to be taken up by consumers. Citi, however,
doesn’t see this happening.
According to the bank, bitcoin’s potential to provide benefits to the
man on the street hasn’t been realised yet. As a result, there are
currently few incentives for end-users to use bitcoin instead of a
credit card, for example.
Bitcoin demand is currently buoyed by users who spend the digital
currency “for love, not money”, the note says. However, evidence from
the market suggests that there isn’t enough love to keep the bitcoin
price from declining:
“Consumers who do use bitcoin [...] are doing it for love, not money. And the flat transactions profile suggests that love may not be enough.”
Other market observers have also concluded that the overhang of
supply from miners and merchants could contribute to bitcoin’s price
weakness. Mark Lamb, chief executive at Coinfloor,
a London-based bitcoin exchange, said that sell-side pressures have
intensified in recent months, with miners and merchants as the most
likely traders.
“Last year miners were selling a much lower percentage of new bitcoin
mined. Nowadays it’s estimated that they’re selling 70–90% of their
bitcoin. Merchants coming in are also probably selling quite a bit of
their bitcoin. So we’re having this constant sell-side demand,” he said.
Big funds aren’t helping
For bitcoin investors hoping for a rise in prices, the presence of a planned $200m hedge fund from Global Advisors, based in Jersey, and the $150m Pantera Capital fund
is a sign that prices have to rise eventually. The Pantera fund, in
particular, only takes long positions on bitcoin, signalling to some
that the digital currency still has room to appreciate.
Citi’s Steven Englander, who wrote the report and is the bank’s
global head of foreign exchange strategy for industrialised economies,
doesn’t buy that argument.
In response to questions from CoinDesk, he said:
“Indications are that [merchant] transactions are flat to falling and investors who bought at higher prices may be cutting rather than adding positions.”
Source : http://www.coindesk.com
BTCChina Reveals Proof of 100% Reserves by Its Proposed Solution
As the first exchange in China who released 100% reserve proof solution (see full announcement and solution here : http://www.bitell.com/t/2042), BTCChina implemented it and finished the audit on Aug.25th.
5 witnesses who are famous in Chinese bitcoin circle were invited to
BTCChina's office to check database and hot/cold wallet amount, pick up
hotline phone calls by random BTCChina users to check user account data
under the user's authorization.
Through a couple of hours' checking, they co-signed a testimony to state that:
- We verified that The total amount in users’ accounts in database is the same with the total amount in cold / hot wallets.
- We checked randomly by users who called in and authorized us, verified that data in the user account is the same with that in platform database.
Through above solutions, we consider that the BTCChina is with full reserves at the time when we checked. '
Source : http://www.bitell.com
No comments:
Post a Comment